|
Articles
|
|
Written by Pawan
Agarwal
|
|
Page 1 of 6 Steam reforming of hydrocarbons for ammonia production was introduced in 1930. Since then, the technology has experienced revolutionary changes in its energy consumption patterns.
Ranging from an early level of 20 Gcal/tonne (79.4 MBtu/tonne) to about 7 Gcal/tonne (27.8 MBtu/tonne) in the last decade of the 20th century.
The energy intensive nature of the process is the key driving force for improving the technology and reducing the overall cost of manufacturing Looking further ahead, we'll review some potentially significant developments and concepts that may impact the manner in which ammonia is produced. Some of these manufacturing routes are being tested or employed at a few plants around the world, but have yet to be fully developed into commercial processes. We'll also review more traditional approaches to ammonia manufacturing along the way.
In the conventional process, steam reforming is carried out in a fired furnace of the side fired or top fired type. Both need large surface areas for uniform heat distribution along the length of the catalyst tubes.
 |
Figure 1: Overall Layout of a Steam Reforming Plant for Ammonia Synthesis (Click to Enlarge) |
This process has several disadvantages. For example, it is a thermally inefficient process (about 90% including the convection zone) and there are mechanical and maintenance issues. The process is difficult to control and reforming plants require a large capital investment.
Future technologies include the use of Gas Heated Reformers (GHR), which are tubular gas-gas exchangers. In the GHR, the secondary reformer outlet gases supply the reforming heat. Though it is not presently being used widely, GHR has certain advantages over fired furnaces. Table 1 shows a list of these advantages. Kellogg's Reforming Exchanger System is an example of GHR technology. Although GHR results in reduced energy consumption, a comprehensive energy conservation network should be established to maximize the benefits of a GHR system.
Table 1: Advantages of Gas Heated Reformers
| Fired Furnace |
Gas Heated Reformers |
| Large volumes |
Smaller volumes |
| Larger surface area and heat loss |
Reduced surface area and heat loss |
| Complex instrumentation |
Simplified instrumentation |
| High maintenance costs |
Low maintenance costs |
| Large convection zone |
No convection zone |
| Stack losses |
No stack losses |
| High fixed capital costs |
Low fixed capital costs |
| Reduced catalyst tube loss from high temperature and uneven heat distribution |
Longer tube life due to uniform heat distribution |
| Increased downtime required for shut down |
Reduced downtime required for shut down |
| Well established process |
Yet to gain wide acceptance |
Also of Note...
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 25 July 2008 11:57 |
Contact Pawan
Agarwal via email:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Join Our Community
Join Our Community
Join the Cheresources.com community. Access our message boards, blogs, file repository, industry news, and join our mailing list.
Latest
Latest Articles
Information on the newest articles, blogs, etc. goes here.
|
|